“‘Use the rod. Beat the child,’ that’s my motto,” asserts Ms Trunchbull, Headmistress of Matilda’s school in Roald Dahl’s remarkable story, Matilda.
Sounds a lot like another motto, “Spare the rod, spoil the child” from another piece of literature. The Bible? Nope. Good guess, though. The exact line is from a 17th century poem by Samuel Butler. In the poem, a love affair is likened to a child, and spanking is commended as a way to make the love grow stronger. I guess that’s for another post.
“Spare the rod, spoil the child” may not be in the Bible but what’s in the Bible is close enough.
Proverbs 13:24 “Whoever spares the rod hates their children. But the one who loves their children is careful to discipline them.”
Proverbs 23:13-14 “Do not withhold discipline from a child; if you punish them with the rod, they will not die. Beat them with the rod and save them from death.”
Proverbs 10:13 “Wisdom is found on the lips of the discerning, but a rod is for the back of one who has no sense.”
Proverbs 20:30 “Blows and wounds scrub away evil, and beatings purge the inmost being.”
Proverbs 22:15 “Foolishness is bound in the heart of a child; but the rod of correction shall drive it far from him.”
Proverbs 26:3 “A whip for the horse, a bridle for the donkey, and a rod for the backs of fools.”
Denise (my wife of 33 years) and I raised our two boys on a “modified” version of the above verses. I say “modified” because the spankings were…
-on the bottom not the back.
-administered not by a rod but by a paddle on our boys – You remember the paddle with the ball attached to it? Devin, one of our sons said, “It’s messed up when parents spank their kids with their own toys.” He’s right.
-not close to “beatings. Though from the perspective of a child, it may have felt like a beating.
-limited to 2-3 smacks.
-not so severe that they left marks.
-not given beyond 10 years of age.
But this is not a post on parenting. It is an invitation to think about how we interpret the Bible.
You see, each of the above characteristics of spanking were “modifications” of the Biblical instructions found in Proverbs. Nope. We didn’t follow the teaching of the Bible when it came to corporal punishment. We modified them. But, we didn’t make these modifications on our own. They were suggested by the guru of parenting instruction in our day, James Dobson. If you look at the website of the organization Dobson founded, “Focus on the Family,” you will find an article with this title: “The Biblical Approach to Parenting.” The “Biblical” approach, it says, is to spank. But, as is asked in the first paragraph, “What does it look like to spank in a way that obeys Scripture…?” Their answer doesn’t sound very much like what the Bible actually teaches about “spanking.” So, what’s up?
They have, according to Dr. William Webb in his book Corporal Punishment in the Bible: A Redemptive Movement Hermeneutic for Troubling Texts, gone “beyond the Bible biblically.”
Abolitionists went beyond the plain teaching of the Bible concerning slavery (Exodus 21:20-21; Ephesians 6:5; 1 Peter 2:18; Titus 2:9-10) to a “better ethic,” an ethic that reflected the spirit of Christ (See Mark Noll’s book, The Civil War as a Theological Crisis). It appears that some of the “pro-spankers” have gone beyond the plain teaching of the Bible concerning corporal punishment.
I’m glad they did. So are my sons!
Here’s something Denise and I are contemplating and discussing: If Dobson and other “pro-spankers” have moved away from the clear, literal teaching of the Bible to an ethic that is more in line with the spirit of Jesus, is it possible that as we learn more about raising kids, we can move away from spanking altogether? Every pastor and parent needs to read Dr. Webb’s book before either lifts a hand or teaches others to lift a hand.
Something else… What does this say about how to interpret the Bible?
Especially those tough to understand passages like slavery and spanking?
Are we moving toward an ethic that reflects the spirit of Jesus?